Laparoscopy became popular in the early 1970′s and soon became the diagnostic tool for ectopic pregnancy. Patient’s with suspected ectopic pregnancy were laparoscoped to confirm the diagnosis. The patient’s then underwent laparotomy and open salpingectomy. In the mid to late 1990′s there were great advances in laparoscopy. These included high powered light sources, high resolution cameras, smaller laparoscopes and the development of laparoscopic instruments. There was then a trend towards laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy. The advantage of laparoscopic surgery soon became apparent in terms of shorter hospital stay and quicker recovery. The choices of operation for ectopic pregnancy are the same in both open and laparoscopic surgery. These include; partial or totally salpingectomy, linea salpingostomy or “milking out” at the ectopic pregnancy.

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) have produced guidelines on the surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. They have suggested up to 80% of cases should be suitable for laparoscopic surgery. Guidelines have been drawn up as to which operations should be performed. If the rest of the pelvis is normal salpingectomy is the procedure of choice, if the other side is abnormal linea salpingostomy should be considered. Due to the higher incidence of recurrent trophoblastic tissue, necessitating further surgery, they advise against “milking out” the tubal pregnancy.

The college have also stressed the importance of adequate training in both diagnostic laparoscopy and operative laparoscopy. There have indeed been cases of maternal mortality associated with diagnostic laparoscopy.

It is important to remember the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery

Laparoscopic Surgery

The surgery usually takes longer, although hospital stay and recovery are shorter. They are also less abdominal scars. The down side of laparoscopic surgery includes; a higher rate of recurrent trophoblastic tissue requiring re-operation.

Open Surgery

The operation time tends to be shorter and more gynaecologists are skilled in laparotomy. The down side includes longer hospital stay and a larger scar on the abdomen.

No matter what surgery is performed, it is important to remember the following facts:-

Whether the patient has laparoscopic or open surgery; whether the surgery is radical as in terms of salpingectomy; or conservative in terms of linea salpingostomy; the “take home baby rate” is the same.

Figure 1: Leaking R ectopic pregnancy

In minimal assess surgery there are a number of different ways of performing both salpingectomy or lineal salpingostomy. With regard to salpingectomy, partial or complete, they can be performed using suture loops or bi or tri-polar diathermy. Linear salpingostomy can be performed by either point diathermy or diathermy scissors. The operation of Lineal salpingectomy is considered to be the most challenging operation for ectopic pregnancy.

The choice depends on the equipment available, the set up of the theatre and the experience of the surgeons.

Every general practitioner worries about missing the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, a fear amplified by the regular reports in the MDU and MPS magazines. Anything that makes GPs more aware of the risks and that increases their clinical acumen must be an important part of GP education. GPs need to learn to think ectopic and exclude ectopic when the potential exists. The uncertainty and consequences of a missed ectopic are such that diagnostic skills and confidence and the understanding of the circumstance of admission are an essential part of safe general practice.

An ectopic is a significant event and much can be learnt by analysing and discussing every ectopic pregnancy within the practice.

General practitioners are in the fortunate position of maintaining a continuing relationship with their patients and this means that they are often called upon to deal with the continuing care of the woman who has an ectopic pregnancy. The fear of failed fertility is a spectre that is maintained after the event and this needs to be tackled with exploration and discussion of the woman’s fears, beliefs and desire for answers. Close liaison between hospital and general practitioner is essential and the information needed to answer the woman’s questions is an essential part of this hospital practice liaison.

Ectopic pregnancy still remains a condition which can be fatal, it can be an easy or extremely difficult diagnosis to make and the consequences of mis-diagnosis can be dire. Although here are a number of investigations which can be performed, there is no agreed protocol and cut off points for serum HCG. The most important reason that the ectopic pregnancies are missing, is that the diagnosis has either not been considered or considered by rejected. Also, there is debate about surgery and although it is RCOG recommendations that 80% of ectopic pregnancies are managed laparoscopically, due to the training and teaching of junior staff there is limited availability for training.

As a generalist gynaecologist, it is important to raise the awareness of the condition and to advise on chlamydia screening and treatment to hopefully reduce risks. The challenge in the future will be both in making the diagnosis and in also having appropriately trained surgeons to undertake minimal assess treatment.

Prior to 1883, no woman ever underwent a deliberate and successful operation for a ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Robert Lawson Tait, sometimes known as “the father of gynecologic surgery,” was born in Edinburgh on May 1, 1845. In 1881, it was suggested to him to remove the ruptured tube in case of an ectopic pregnancy. “… the suggestion staggered me, and I am ashamed to say that I did not receive it favorably.” The postmortem examination convinced him that it could be done. So, 2 years later, Tait ligated the broad ligament and tube in another patient, and this patient survived. In 1888, Tait reported only 2 deaths out of 42 operated cases, a marked improvement for a condition that had been almost always fatal. Following Tait’s accomplishment, little occurred in the management of ectopic pregnancy until the 1940s, when blood banking came into use. While this was a major development, the serious difficulty of diagnosis remained in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Many women with a little abnormal bleeding and abdominal pain were considered to possibly have an ectopic pregnancy, but only a few did. One of the major tools for diagnosis was culdocentesis. This was of no benefit if the findings were negative, and the findings were only positive if the ectopic pregnancy was already ruptured.

Approximately 30 years ago, ectopic pregnancy was a difficult diagnosis and a very common cause of maternal mortality. Because of the development of a rapid test for the beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and the development of high-quality ultrasound images, ectopic pregnancy is frequently diagnosed early and treated before it can cause morbidity or mortality.

The advent of these 2 tests is the major reason that maternal morbidity is now measured as cases per 100,000 live births instead of cases per 10,000 live births, as it was 35 years ago. The advent of laparoscopic surgery has further reduced morbidity.

Pregnancy tests in the 1960s did not return positive results until approximately 6 menstrual weeks. Approximately 50% of all women with proven ectopic pregnancies had a negative result from the pregnancy test. Starting in the late 1960s, ultrasound was developed, along with a sensitive and accurate test for the beta subunit of hCG. This technology revolutionized the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. At approximately the same time, laparoscopy was developed. This led to the minimally invasive treatment of ectopic pregnancies. Then, in the 1980s, medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy with methotrexate was developed.

Laparoscopy was first performed in animals in the early 1900s by Dr. Georg Kelling in Berlin. The Swedish surgeon Dr. Hans Christian Jacobaeus published a description of a technique he called “laparothoroscopy” (used to evaluate peritoneal tuberculosis) in 1910. However, it has been only since the 1960s that better techniques and instruments have lead to the acceptance of laparoscopy as a safe and valuable procedure.

Initially, gynecologic laparoscopy was performed almost exclusively for diagnosis and to perform tubal ligations. By the late 1970s, the role of laparoscopy expanded to include lysis of adhesions, treatment of endometriosis, and removal of ovarian cysts. Laparoscopy has become a treatment of choice for removal of ectopic pregnancy. Compared with laparotomy, multiple studies have shown laparoscopy to be safer, to be less expensive, and to have a shorter recovery time

The most common clinical presentation is pelvic pain, vaginal spotting, or both. This usually occurs 4-8 weeks after the last menstrual period. Abdominal tenderness may be noted upon examination. Upon pelvic examination, tenderness is usually observed. If a mass is palpable, it is most likely a corpus luteum on the ovary. The ectopic pregnancy is usually too small, tender, and soft to be palpable. Pain is usually the result of stretching of the peritoneum over the tube. Once the tube ruptures, pain usually decreases or disappears. If the tube has ruptured, the patient may present in shock with tachycardia and hypotension. Shoulder pain from diaphragmatic irritation is a late sign and is seldom seen in current practice.

The quantitative level of beta-hCG found in ectopic pregnancy varies. Serum beta-hCG levels correlate with the size and gestational age in normal embryonic growth. In a normal pregnancy, the beta-hCG level doubles every 48 hours until it reaches 10,000-20,000 mIU/mL. With ectopic pregnancies, beta-hCG levels usually increase less. The discriminatory zone of beta-hCG is the level above which a normal intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) is reliably visualized. Once beta-hCG has reached a level of 2000 mIU/mL, a gestational sac should be seen within the uterus on transvaginal ultrasound scan images. Once it has reached 6000 mIU/mL, a gestational sac should be visualized within the uterus on abdominal scan images. Endovaginal ultrasonography to exclude an IUP can be performed in the outpatient clinic or emergency department.